2. Long-range water planning vital for power
3. Drought from the Power Perspective
- •1. San Antonio takes key solar step; will Austin follow suit?
By Laylan Copelin AMERICAN-STATESMAN Jan 11, 2012
(Contributed by Frank Burney)
San Antonio took a giant step Wednesday toward its goal of creating jobs and using more solar power as it aims to become a hub for the solar industry.
CPS Energy, the municipally owned utility, selected OCI Solar Power, a subsidiary of a South Korean company, from a list of 19 bidders to bring at least 800 jobs, with an annual payroll of $40 million and 400 megawatts of solar power undefined enough to power about 80,000 homes.
It is an approach that could reignite a Central Texas debate over whether Austin Energy should try a similar approach and leverage its purchasing power into attracting more jobs from the renewable energy industry.
As part of the deal, CPS Energy is expected to purchase solar power from OCI for 25 years.
Another Seoul-based firm, Nexolon Co., is the anchor manufacturer in OCI's consortium. OCI Solar has promised to locate its worldwide headquarters in San Antonio, and Nexolon will relocate its North American headquarters to the Alamo City, according to CPS officials.
It is expected to take at least three months to negotiate the final contract, but San Antonio officials are already celebrating.
In a conference call Wednesday, San Antonio Mayor Julian Castro said many questioned whether the city could leverage the buying power of one of the nation's largest public utilities into jobs.
"San Antonio has reached the sweet spot at the intersection of job creation and environmental stewardship," Castro said.
In Austin, officials have taken a different approach, saying they prefer to use rebates, conservation grants, green building programs and promotion of solar panels on buildings as a way to create a self-sustaining market, as opposed to being tied to one company or group of companies.
But as Austin Energy is set to begin public hearings tonight on its proposed rate increase, solar advocate Tom "Smitty" Smith said solar energy proponents will urge the Austin City Council to copy the San Antonio model.
"The race is on" to become a manufacturing hub, Smith said. "They are going to beat us, unless Austin takes action quickly."
San Antonio stunned the solar industry when last year it increased its request for solar power from 50 megawatts to 400 megawatts, which would put the Alamo City in the top tier of solar users around the globe. Castro said Wednesday that the 400 megawatts would complete the utility's goal of getting 20 percent of its power from renewable energy by 2020.
Utility officials declined to say what price they would be paying for solar power.
As outlined by OCI Solar Power, the solar project would be operational in phases over the next five years. There would be multiple manufacturing facilities in San Antonio, producing various components for solar panels, and several solar panel installations, according to the news release.
During the conference call, officials said half of 400 megawatts could be solar farms far away from San Antonio and Bexar County.
OCI Solar Power has the advantage of the deep pockets of its parent company, OCI Co. Ltd., but it is powering up only its first solar farm next week in New Jersey. Company officials said they have 40 projects in development in the U.S. and Canada.
Many of the details of the deal remained vague Wednesday because contract negotiations are just beginning, but an Austin-based energy expert, Robert King, said the announcement of 800 jobs is significant.
"I know Austin is going to have pangs of jealousy for a while," he said.
*********************************************************************************
Long-range water planning vital for power
American Statesmen Editorial Board Jan 11, 2012
(Contributed by Frank Burney)
Texas business and political leaders brag with some justification about the state's economic success.
Though the state did not escape the economic turbulence of 2008 unscathed, Texas is doing comparatively well.
But as Texas senators learned this week, it is difficult to do business in the dark. The stubborn drought that has gripped the state for over a year now menaces its capacity to generate electricity. That means that the effects of drought reach far beyond the state's farms and ranches. Members of the Senate Business and Commerce Committee, including Sen. Kirk Watson, D-Austin, urged long- and short-term action to maintain the state's economic health. It's going to take a combination of energy conservation and development of alternate energy sources to keep the state's lights on, as the American-Statesman's Laylan Copelin reported in Wednesday's editions.
There was not much good news in the briefing the senators got from a variety of experts, regulators and administrators. Water development is essential to cool coal-fired and nuclear power plants.
Solar and wind power generation plants don't use water, but the power they generate is more expensive.
Trip Doggett, the chief executive of the Electric Reliability Council of Texas, which operates the state's electric grid, told the committee he expects severe consequences if the drought lasts into 2013.
George Bomar, a meteorologist with the Texas Department of Licensing and Regulation, testified recent rains have helped to ease the drought's impact, but not broken it. The forecaster also predicted that it is "very likely we're not going to see the spring rains we need to break the drought. We have little reason to expect major relief from drought until we are deep into 2012."
Take those two together and the state will be cutting it close undefined if nature cooperates.
Wednesday, we discussed the state water plan that includes proposals for the construction of new reservoirs and desalinization plants to supplement conservation efforts.
Though those proposals should be taken seriously and explored thoroughly, no one should be deluded into thinking dam construction is either easy or cheap. Building dams involves processes that take years.
Moreover, building dams means building the consensus that they are needed and won't unfairly impede property rights or harm the environment. All that is much easier said than done.
Donna Nelson, who leads the Public Utility Commission, told the committee that the agency is working on promoting energy conservation, including the use of incentives to cut peak-time power demand and she noted the state has plenty of wind power.
Two committee members urged their colleagues and other state officials to take a much longer view.
"It's not just about next year. It's not just about 2013. The decisions we have to make now are about 2025, and we're not making them," declared Sen. Leticia Van de Putte, D-San Antonio.
"I don't think there's been a greater dereliction of duty" than failing to fund Texas water needs, said Sen. John Carona, R-Dallas, the committee chairman.
They are both right as rain.
Drought from the Power Perspective
By AMY HARDBERGER | Published: OCTOBER 13, 2011 ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND - TEXAS WATER SOLUTIONS (CONTRIBUTED BY LES SHEPHARD)
We have said itbefore and we will say it again undefined NO ONE is immune from drought and the latest group feeling the pinch is the power producer. This should be no surprise as we havewritten extensively on the energy water relationship. Drought not only limits the water available for our water needs, it may also limit our power.
Texas' record breaking drought reduces the amount of available waterpower plants require for cooling. If that water is not available, the plant must stop running. Despite this critical co-dependency, power and water are still planned separately. In times of limited water supply, this can cause big problems. So what is the solution? Well in the short term, the options are somewhat limited.
Maximizing conservation and efficiency by all users will help protect water for power use. Private landowners are also seeingan opportunity. One landowner wants to sell almost 400 million gallons of water per year to the newly permitted White Stallion plant. White Stallion has encounteredchallenges in obtaining water rights because of public opposition and limited water availability. While potentially serving a short-term goal, approval of the sale of groundwater for these purposes will cause significant problems for nearby land owners sharing in this resource, particularly in times of drought. Simply selling water and re-purposing it will not work for the long term.
For the future, we must think beyond the short term because one thing is certain, after this drought there will be another one. We need to learn from this one and put policies in place to be ready for the next. The power and the water sectors need to come together in their planning. New power plants, particularly those being built in drier areas,need to use
When we discuss energy security, water must be a integral part of that conversation so we don't end up sitting in the dark craving a glass of water.