To print this page properly - use Print icon located on the page.
Please note that JavaScript has to be enabled.
  

Mike's Blog

We've designed our blog to help keep our community informed of interesting and important environmental and business topics. To get regular updates, subscribe to this blog via email (yep, that link down there), or add our feed to your RSS feed reader. Enjoy!

Subscribe via Email! Receive our blog via Email 
Subscribe to our email feed.
Add our RSS feed! Add our blog to your RSS Feeds
Subscribe to our RSS feed.
<< first  < prev   1   2   3   4   5   ...   next >  last >> 
  • 08-Mar-10 06:35 | Site Administrator (administrator)

    Our March 9 Water Forum at the historic Pearl Stable will occur in a couple of days. In addition to the 11:30am to 1:30pm program that is being recorded for prime time television and radio broadcast, the San Antonio Water System, Edwards Aquifer Authority, and the San Antonio River Authority will provide displays and informational material in the foyer from 10:30am to 2:00pm.

    We are pleased that almost the entire Texas House Committee on Natural Resources will attend our program with many of their staff members. The House Committee will then hold hearings beginning at 2pm in the San Antonio City Council Chambers.

    We are told that this will be the largest audience to attend a luncheon program in the history of the renovated Pearl Stable so that is another challenge to beginning our program on time.

    Please plan to arrive as early as possible – no later than 11:00am, to be seated by 11:15am, as the program will begin promptly at 11:30am.

    The location of the event is at the historic Pearl Stable:

    Pearl Stable
    www.eventsatpearl.com

    map_rev.gif

    312 Pearl Parkway
    San Antonio, TX
    (210) 212-9539

    For directions, go to http://www.eventsatpearl.com/maps.

    Again this Forum is completely SOLD-OUT, so please no walk-ins.

    Thanks to all for your support of this critically important Forum.

    Need help, call Mike Burke 210-269-7962

     

  • 03-Mar-10 10:10 | Site Administrator (administrator)

    Our March 9 Water Forum at the historic Pearl Stable is just a week away. In addition to the 11:30am to 1:30pm program that is being recorded for prime time television and radio broadcast, the San Antonio Water System, Edwards Aquifer Authority, and the San Antonio River Authority will provide displays and informational material in the foyer from 10:30am to 2:00pm.

    We are pleased that almost the entire Texas House Committee on Natural Resources will attend our program with many of their staff members. The House Committee will then hold hearings beginning at 2pm in the San Antonio City Council Chambers.

    We are told that this will be the largest audience to attend a luncheon program in the history of the renovated Pearl Stable. (Unfortunately we have had to turn away almost 70 individuals.)

    Please plan to arrive as early as possible – no later than 11:00am, to be seated by 11:15am, as the program will begin promptly at 11:30am.

    Thanks to all for your support of this critically important Forum.

    Mike


    A very nice, "sunny" development for UTSA:

    Mike, March 3, 2010

    We just heard that the College of Engineering at UTSA along with the Facilities department here won a $1.3 million  grant from the state of Texas to install solar panels on some campus buildings and use this process as a teaching tool while producing clean energy for the campus!!  Here is a short description of the project:

    The objectives of this project are to produce large-scale and small-scale solar
    energy in prototype buildings on the campus of University of Texas at San Antonio (UTSA) that can be replicated in colleges and residential neighborhoods throughout the state of Texas. In particular, we leverage San Antonio’s significant yearly sunlight exposure to efficiently generate distributed solar power. The initial distributed solar renewable energy plants will be built at two UTSA sites and architected to enable future expansion to additional university buildings sites.  We also integrate sensors for real time fault monitoring, energy usage feedback, and a centralized energy information kiosk. The outcome of this effort is the annual production of 237 mega-watt-hours of energy, which will benefit UTSA by saving $64,000 per year. We also reduce CO2 emissions by 274,000 lbs/year.  Finally, we will form a technical team that will develop renewable energy short courses, publications, and training modules for engineers,
    students, and the public.

    CPS Energy is partnering in this endeavor.

    Mauli Agrawal – Dean, College of Engineering - UTSA

  • 02-Mar-10 10:52 | Site Administrator (administrator)
    There are so many issues, problems and challenges surrounding the subject of water. This Sunday’s NY Times article submitted by Myfe Moore provides an excellent example of that. We will not be able to effectively address this issue at our March 9 Water Forum, but hopefully we will do so in the not too distant future.

    Re: Our March 9 Water Forum- we really are completely sold-out. I have had to turn away over sixty individuals so please no more requests to get in.

    But the good news for those who cannot attend, Texas Public Radio just announced that they will be taping the program for future prime time listening – just as KLRN will be doing for future prime time viewing.

    Finally, many of you pointed out that yesterday we failed to include access to the full article:The U.S. Solar Market: Assessing the Potential so we have done so below.

    Mike


    Rulings Restrict Clean Water Act, Foiling E.P.A.

    By CHARLES DUHIGG and JANET ROBERTS NY Times Feb 28, 2010

    Thousands of the nation’s largest water polluters are outside the Clean Water Act’s reach because the Supreme Court has left uncertain which waterways are protected by that law, according to interviews with regulators.

    As a result, some businesses are declaring that the law no longer applies to them. And pollution rates are rising.

    Companies that have spilled oil, carcinogens and dangerous bacteria into lakes, rivers and other waters are not being prosecuted, according to Environmental Protection Agency regulators working on those cases, who estimate that more than 1,500 major pollution investigations have been discontinued or shelved in the last four years.

    The Clean Water Act was intended to end dangerous water pollution by regulating every major polluter. But today, regulators may be unable to prosecute as many as half of the nation’s largest known polluters because officials lack jurisdiction or because proving jurisdiction would be overwhelmingly difficult or time consuming, according to midlevel officials.

    "We are, in essence, shutting down our Clean Water programs in some states," said Douglas F. Mundrick, an E.P.A. lawyer in Atlanta. "This is a huge step backward. When companies figure out the cops can’t operate, they start remembering how much cheaper it is to just dump stuff in a nearby creek."

    "This is a huge deal," James M. Tierney, the New York State assistant commissioner for water resources, said of the new constraints. "There are whole watersheds that feed into New York’s drinking water supply that are, as of now, unprotected."

    The court rulings causing these problems focused on language in the Clean Water Act that limited it to "the discharge of pollutants into the navigable waters" of the United States. For decades, "navigable waters" was broadly interpreted by regulators to include many large wetlands and streams that connected to major rivers.

    But the two decisions suggested that waterways that are entirely within one state, creeks that sometimes go dry, and lakes unconnected to larger water systems may not be "navigable waters" and are therefore not covered by the act — even though pollution from such waterways can make its way into sources of drinking water.

    Some argue that such decisions help limit overreaching regulatory efforts.

    Much more at: http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/01/us/01water.html?emc=eta1


    The U.S. Solar Market: Assessing the Potential

    by Swami Venkataraman, Standard & Poor's February 23, 2010

    Declining costs and stronger tax and investment incentives are making solar power more cost competitive with the fuels that America's utilities have traditionally used to generate electricity.

    A February 2009 report by the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory found that the installed costs before tax incentives for residential and commercial photovoltaic systems had fallen to $7.60 per watt from $10.50 per watt in 2007 dollars. The report also found that the costs for silicon PV panels had stalled in 2005, that costs varied widely from state to state and that economies of scale improved for systems larger than 750 kW. All the while, installation costs in Japan and Germany situated themselves well below those in the U.S., introducing the possibility that U.S. installation costs could drop.

    Certainly, the cost of installing U.S. PV systems is declining. Recent developments suggest a dramatic shift over the next few years in PV economics. After years of tight supplies, there is a surplus of PV modules. Strong European demand in the first half of 2008 increased industry capacity and production and prices have fallen since (see Figure 1, below). Silicon and panel producers have significantly increased their capacity and the surplus of panels on the market will continue for years to come. Additionally, the 2009 liberalization of the investment tax credit (ITC) will lower PV installation costs for commercial customers and some residential buyers.

    More at: http://www.renewableenergyworld.com/rea/news/article/2010/02/the-u-s-solar-market-assessing-the-potential?cmpid=WNL-Tuesday-February23-2010

  • 01-Mar-10 19:06 | Site Administrator (administrator)

    The current power and control of Texas underwater districts is enormous and this fact is critical for the future water supply options of the San Antontio region. I highly recommend article #1.... and you can see why we are so pleased that 10 of the 11 Texas House Committee on Natural Resources member will be attending our March 9 forum.Please send to Bob Rivard and me ASAP your questions and issues that you would like to see covered in our Water Forum.

    I also think that Jan Jarboe Russell's column re: Mayor Julian Castro and Standard & Poor's current assessment on solar power are worth your time.

    Mike


    State aims to make groundwater rules more uniform

    Different districts have different sensibilities.

    Asher Price   Austin American Statesman   February 28, 2010

    With the population of Central Texas booming, water has become the chief maker or breaker of development. With just about every drop of river water already spoken for, suppliers, especially in Central Texas, are turning to underground water in counties to the east as the next big source.

    But they face a problem because groundwater districts, set up as individual fiefdoms meant to reflect local histories and philosophies about water and land use, have different permitting rules and sensibilities.

    In the Legislature, at the Texas Water Development Board and in the courts, a struggle is under way to make the rules more uniform from one district to another and to come up with aquifer pumping caps, so the state can do better water planning over the next half-century. 

    The districts are proliferating: Today there are 98 groundwater districts, up from 51 in 1995, according to the Texas Water Development Board, the state agency charged with water planning. Their boards have broad-ranging powers derived from the Legislature, including the authority to set rates for pumping permits, to set pumping limits and well spacing and, typically, to levy taxes. What they can't do is set fees or taxes beyond limits prescribed by the Legislature, and they can't arbitrarily deny permits.

    More at:  http://www.statesman.com/news/local/state-aims-to-make-groundwater-rules-more-uniform-298450.html 


    Castro earns right to define his future — and S.A.’s

     Jan Jarboe Russell    SA Express News   February 28, 2010

    Like every other elected official, Mayor Julián Castro’s success depends both on expectations set by his predecessor and future events he doesn’t control.

    In Castro’s case, the bar for expectations was high. He followed the popular Phil Hardberger, who benefited from the low expectations set by his predecessor, Ed Garza, whose own tenure was weak.

    While Hardberger came into office with big-money backing, Castro’s support from the business community during the 2009 campaign was thin as ice. He assumed power in the middle of a national economic recession and a vexing local problem: CPS Energy’s misbegotten deal with NRG Energy to expand the South Texas Project.

    In September 2005, an unexpected crisis — Hurricane Katrina — gave Hardberger the chance to define his future. At a time when other cities were shunning Katrina evacuees, Hardberger went on national television and said evacuees were welcome in San Antonio. He performed admirably and set the tone for the rest of his tenure.

    In a similar way, Castro’s handling of the nuclear folly may well be his Katrina moment.

    Nine months ago, the heavyweights in the business community were gaga in their support of CPS Energy owning 50 percent of STP 3 and 4 — at any cost. Most politicians would have bowed to political pressure. Instead, Castro took the harder road. He was supportive of the nuclear expansion, as long as the numbers made sense. This deliberative approach set the tone for Castro’s tenure.

    Soon it was clear to all but those living under a rock that the numbers did not make sense. CPS Energy’s cost estimate of $13 billion was pure fiction. Castro could have dodged the truth and left the problem to some future unfortunate mayor.

    Instead, he went public. He assumed the lead in fixing a secretive, closed culture at CPS Energy and took offensive measures against NRG, our shark-like partner. Rather than rely on timid in-house counsel, he forced CPS Energy to hire a shark of its own: Washington energy lawyer Clint Vince.

    Vince filed suit against NRG in San Antonio, which made sure the venue would be here, not a place of NRG’s choosing.

    Castro sat back and let the legal battle boil. Then, on Jan. 4, he sent a three-paragraph letter to CPS Energy and NRG officials asking all parties to negotiate an out-of-court settlement. A more passive mayor might have let the lawsuit drag on for years.

    The settlement isn’t perfect, but it does stop San Antonio’s $1 million-a-day payments for the nuclear expansion and preserves CPS Energy’s 7.6 percent share of the project, should the project get federal loan guarantees and NRG finds new partners.

    Meanwhile, Castro made the hard sell to the City Council that despite the utility’s brazen mismanagement, a CPS rate increase of 7.5 percent was necessary. Against all odds, he got every single council member to vote yes.

    For now, Castro’s storm has passed. His joke is that instead of being mayor of utilities, he now has the chance to be mayor of San Antonio and focus on his own expectations.

    jrussell@express-news.net


    The U.S. Solar Market: Assessing the Potential

    by Swami Venkataraman, Standard & Poor's   February 23, 2010

    Declining costs and stronger tax and investment incentives are making solar power more cost competitive with the fuels that America's utilities have traditionally used to generate electricity.

    A February 2009 report by the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory found that the installed costs before tax incentives for residential and commercial photovoltaic systems had fallen to $7.60 per watt from $10.50 per watt in 2007 dollars. The report also found that the costs for silicon PV panels had stalled in 2005, that costs varied widely from state to state and that economies of scale improved for systems larger than 750 kW. All the while, installation costs in Japan and Germany situated themselves well below those in the U.S., introducing the possibility that U.S. installation costs could drop.

    Certainly, the cost of installing U.S. PV systems is declining. Recent developments suggest a dramatic shift over the next few years in PV economics. After years of tight supplies, there is a surplus of PV modules. Strong European demand in the first half of 2008 increased industry capacity and production and prices have fallen since (see Figure 1, below). Silicon and panel producers have significantly increased their capacity and the surplus of panels on the market will continue for years to come.

  • 21-Feb-10 00:38 | Site Administrator (administrator)
    1. How you can help re: a tragic development.
    2. Status of our March 9 Water Forum
    3. An excellent WSJ article on the emergence of small nuclear reactors
    4. The expensive prospects of nuclear costs


    A personal appeal: I just learned yesterday of a tragic development, with devastating , personal and family consequences to my good friend and San Antonio Clean Technology Advisor Board member – Hollis Fitch – CEO, Cinco Solar. The two missing San Antonio high school sisters you may have heard about are Hollis’s daughters:

    http://www.mysanantonio.com/news/Teens_possibly_ran_away_after_role-playing.html

    Please put Hollis and his family in your prayers. Also, Hollis has set up a facebook account "Missing girls Elsa and Celia Fitch" – there is also a place for donations – He has hired 3 private investigators to work along with the sheriff.


    On a more positive note, I am happy to report that our March 9 Water Forum has sold out almost three weeks before the event. We will have 450 attendees at our Forum – the largest number the historic Pearl Stable has seen for a luncheon.

    We have reconfirmed that the entire Texas House Committee on Natural Resources will be in attendance.

    KLRN and Pearl Stable representatives have been working diligently to assure an excellent prime time broadcast.

    The San Antonio Water Systems (SAWS), San Antonio River Authority (SARA).  And the Edwards Aquifer Authority (EAA) have stepped up to provide some excellent exhibits for attendees to view prior to and following our program.

    So our March 9 Water Forum offering includes excellent exhibits From 10:30am to 2:00pm and an outstanding program from 11:30am to 1:30pm.

    Mike


    Small Nuclear Reactors Generate Big Hopes

    Rebecca Smith Wall Street Journal Feb 18, 2009

    A new type of nuclear reactor—smaller than a rail car and one tenth the cost of a big plant—is emerging as a contender to reshape the nation's resurgent nuclear power industry.

    Three big utilities, Tennessee Valley Authority, First Energy Corp. and Oglethorpe Power Corp., on Wednesday signed an agreement with McDermott International Inc.'s Babcock & Wilcox subsidiary, committing to get the new reactor approved for commercial use in the U.S.

    See complete article at:

    http://online.wsj.com/article_email/SB10001424052748703444804575071402124482176-lMyQjAxMTAwMDEwOTExNDkyWj.html


    Mike,

    Thought I'd pass this on because it mirrors Craig and Arjun's economic analyses of nuclear costs. This article cites no fewer than four independent sources, including Citibank, that seem to agree on the expensive prospects of nuclear. Guess President Obama isn't listening. :)

    Cindy Wheeler

    http://news.infoshop.org/article.php?story=20100214021312961

  • 15-Feb-10 22:49 | Site Administrator (administrator)
    1. March 9 Water Forum sell-out
    2. Watching China Run
    3. US DOE office of Energy & Efficiency announcements

    Our March 9 Water Forum will be the largest attended luncheon or dinner event in the history of the historic Pearl Stable.  There are only 14 seats remaining to be sold.

    Mike


    (Contributed by Wayne Alexander)

    Watching China Run

    By Bob Herbert NY Times February 13, 2010

    Two weeks ago, as I was getting ready to take off for Palo Alto, Calif., to cover a conference on the importance of energy and infrastructure for the next American economy, The Times’s Keith Bradsher was writing from Tianjin, China, about how the Chinese were sprinting past everybody else in the world, including the United States, in the race to develop clean energy.

    That we are allowing this to happen is beyond stupid. China is a poor country with nothing comparable to the tremendous research, industrial and economic resources that the U.S. has been blessed with. Yet they’re blowing us away — at least for the moment — in the race to the future.

    China also has become the world’s largest manufacturer of solar panels and is pushing hard on other clean energy advances. As Mr. Bradsher wrote: "These efforts to dominate renewable energy technologies raise the prospect that the West may someday trade its dependence on oil from the Mideast for a reliance on solar panels, wind turbines and other gear manufactured in China."

    We’re in the throes of an awful and seemingly endless employment crisis, and China is the country moving full speed ahead on the development of the world’s most important new industries. I’d like one of the Washington suits to step away from the photo-op and explain the logic of that to me.

    The truth, of course, is that there is no reason at all for this to be happening. The United States, in many ways, is very well prepared to move ahead on clean energy. It could and should be the world’s leader. Many, if not most, of the innovations in this area were developed right here. But much of that know-how, as we are seeing in China (and have been seeing in Germany and other places), is being implemented overseas.

    The network of world-class universities and advanced research institutions in the U.S. is by far the most impressive in the world: think Harvard and Stanford and Berkeley and M.I.T. and on and on. If you add to that the venture capital community in the U.S. with its vast experience and the willingness of investors to take risks, and the sheer entrepreneurial talent of the American business community, you end up with an array of resources fully capable of moving the U.S. into a low-carbon, high-growth and extraordinarily productive economy that would be the envy of the world.

    But for that to happen — as Bruce Katz, a Brookings executive who was one of the organizers of the conference, pointed out — America’s corporate, civic and political leaders will have to "articulate what’s really at stake here."

    And what’s at stake is the future of the American economy. The low-carbon era is coming. We can be dragged into that newer, greener world by leading countries like China; or we can take up the challenge and become the world’s leader ourselves.

    Complete article at: http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/13/opinion/13herbert.html?emc=eta1


    A weekly newsletter from the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE). The EERE Network News is also available on the Web at: www.eere.energy.gov/news/enn.cfm

    February 10, 2010

    News and Events

    · President Obama Announces Three Steps to Boost Biofuels

    · Biomass Crop Assistance Program to Spur Production of Renewable Energy

    · U.S. Wind Energy Industry Installed Nearly 10,000 MW in 2009

    · U.S. Geothermal Energy Capacity Grew 6% in 2009

    · GM Invests $246 Million in Electric Motors and Components in Baltimore

    · Florida Company Donates Solar Lights to Haiti

  • 13-Feb-10 22:14 | Site Administrator (administrator)

    Reminder: Plan to attend some of the presentations at the wonderful water forum at Trinity University Feb 14-16. See: www.salsa.net/peace/water

    I highly recommend the article, Sink or Swim, at the end of this e-mail.

    And isn't it great that the University of Incarnate Word is competing in the national Solar House competition.

    Mike


    Mike,

    UIW has just posted a notice for the position of a Solar House Project Manager. We will build a solar powered structure on campus, and are currently applying to be accepted into the 2011 Solar Decathlon in Washington, DC. (www.solardecathlon.org) This project will include our engineering students, other departments across campus, and technology students from St. Phillip’s College. This will be an exciting and very visible project that will bring attention to our young Engineering Management degree program at UIW.

    The notice will be in the SA Express News this Sunday. To view the notice and apply, go to http://jobs.uiw.edu

    "The Project Manager will facilitate the construction of a solar powered house on the UIW campus. This project may include participation in the Department of Energy's Solar Decathlon 2011 in Washington, D.C. This is a one-year position with the possibility of an extension dependent on the renewal of grant funding."

    Thanks!! Alison F. Whittemore, Ph.D.
    Chair, Department of Engineering and Physics School of Mathematics, Science, and Engineering
    The University of the Incarnate Word whittemo@uiwtx.edu 210-829-3151


    In California, Lake Shasta is experiencing very low water levels.

    Sink or swim

    by Sara Stroud - 2.1.10

    While economists, policymakers and media spent much of 2009 discussing theUnited Nations Climate Change Conference in Copenhagen, a different delegation was discussing a threat just as severe to the economy, the environment and human health: water shortages.

    The world is on the verge of water bankruptcy, according to the World Economic Forum, which made water the subject of discussion at its 2009 meeting in Davos, Switzerland. Using excessive water to fuel economic growth has created unsustainable regional "water bubbles," which will bring serious political and economic repercussions when they burst, according to the Geneva-based nonprofit.

    By 2030, more than one-third of the world’s population will live in severely water-scarce areas if current consumption patterns persist, revealed a 2009 report by McKinsey & Company. But as the threat of water scarcity intensifies, so will the stream of capital flowing to markets and technologies taking on the water challenge—global water sector revenues will total almost $1 trillion by 2020, according to Lux Research.

    Utilities, governments and businesses increasingly will need to reduce their water consumption, and in order to do so, they must start measuring their water use. Meeting the world’s future water management needs presents a big opportunity for new and established companies that can help public and private entities do just that.

    Skimming the surface

    In 2008, water startups received less than 2 percent of total venture funds poured into the cleantech sector, according to research fromCleantech Group. And in 2009, $117 million out of a total of $5.6 billion directed to cleantech companies overall in venture capital was directed to water companies.

    Why such low interest in water-saving technologies? One reason is the water sector hasn’t typically rewarded investors, Steve Vassallo, a principal at Menlo Park, Calif.–based Foundation Capital, told Sustainable Industries in mid-2009. This is in part because entrepreneurs with good ideas and business plans often face regulatory hurdles, while the water’s artificially low price dampens investors’ incentive to back water plays.

    Trees that once produced avocados now stand bare due to drought.

    But despite the slow trickle of venture capital investment into water conservation tools thus far, analysts say the sector will inevitably grow: Increasing pressure caused by water shortages and aging domestic water infrastructure means there’s a solid future for technologies to help conserve the precious liquid.

    "Twentieth century water technology can no longer serve 21st century water issues," says David Henderson, managing director of XPV Capital Corp., a Toronto-based venture capital firm focusing solely on water investments. "The only way forward is through technology."

    While advanced water treatment technologies have received much of the attention—and investments—thus far, water information technology is a key tool in the effort to cut water consumption. Just as the market for smart grid technologies is expected to continue its sharp upward trajectory, the market for smarter water technologies is also poised to swell, analysts say.

    "Managing water-related issues is becoming just as important as managing energy issues," says Laura Shenkar, a principal at The Artemis Project, a San Francisco–based water consultancy.

    Water information technology could grow from a $530 million market to a $16..3 billion market over the coming decade, according to a 2009 report by Lux Research.

    Tracking water’s path from source to end use, the report examined five segments of the water information technology sector: water mapping, water infrastructure, water quality monitoring, smart meters and smart irrigation. Each segment is essential in providing water utilities with information they need to manage water loss.

    Diving in

    While this nascent market offers a lot of opportunity for startups with innovative solutions, water information technology’s biggest winners will likely be companies that offer complete water management solutions and systems integrators, the report says.

    "It’s an integrated problem and it needs an integrated solution," says Lux Research analyst Heather Landis, who wrote the report.

    One such company—and the one making perhaps the biggest splash in water information technology, at least for now—is IBM (NYSE: IBM). The Armonk, N.Y.–based tech giant in 2008 launched its Smarter Water Initiative as part of its $100 million Big Green Innovations program, created to identify and launch new opportunities in the environmental sector.

    "Water utilities are transforming … and going the way of the smart grid," says Sharon Nunes, vice president of IBM Big Green Innovations. The water industry is moving toward more data-driven decision-making processes, but someone needs to collect and manage that data, putting it into a format that’s accessible to end users, she says.

    IBM’s Strategic Water Information Management system uses sensors to gather and transmit data, and offers modeling, visualizing and analytical tools that aim to help system managers pinpoint trouble spots, ideally maximizing efficiency while minimizing loss.

    In November 2009, IBM announced deals with three utilities—one in Australia, one in Japan and the Lower Colorado River Authority. The company has also worked on a water quality management project in Ireland, and its software is being used by the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission to manage 1,000 miles of sewer system and its wastewater treatment facilities.

    IBM and other large companies could also make their influence felt through acquisitions and partnerships. Utilities are inclined to work with large and established players, so smaller companies and specialized startups would benefit from partnering with a large-scale integrator with a global reach, according to the Lux report.

    For its part, IBM is pursuing acquisitions that strengthen its analytics portfolio, Nunes says. IBM has been acquiring companies that have an informational component: In 2006, IBM bought Massachusetts-based MRO Software, and now uses MRO’s Maximo asset management software for its water management applications.

    Another company focused on water information technology at the utility level is Liberty Lake, Wash.–based Itron (Nasdaq: ITRI), which provides advanced metering and meter data management for electric, gas and water utilities.

    In mid-2008 the company rolled out Water SaveSource, an advanced metering and monitoring solution. Itron’s technology pinpoints leaks on both sides of the meter, which can collect information continually to create customer usage profiles and help manage conservation programs.

    Itron, which reported $1.2 billion in revenues for the first nine months of 2009, has seen a surge in interest in its advanced water metering technology, says Peter Sanburn, senior product marketing analyst for the company. Some of that has been fueled by the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, he adds, which set aside about $6 billion for drinking water and wastewater infrastructure projects.

    Staying afloat

    After the stimulus funds dry up, there’s a question of whether utilities will shell out the money for advanced technology, which can be expensive to implement.

    But while adopting water information technology can be costly, not implementing it could be even pricier: The U.S Geological Survey estimates that the country’s water distribution systems lose about 1.7 trillion gallons per year, at a cost of $2.6 billion.

    The cause? Aging infrastructure, which will likely not be able to keep pace with the country’s water distribution needs. By 2020, the funding shortage for U.S. water infrastructure operation, maintenance and investment could reach $20 billion, according to U.S Environmental Protection Agency. But the agency also points to new technologies and management practices as a way to partially fill that funding gap.

    The growth of the ecosystem services market will inevitably place a higher value on water conservation [see "Banking on biodiversity," Sustainable Industries, September 2009]. Water markets will be worth $500 million in 2010, estimates Washington, D.C–based Ecosystem Marketplace. That’s a drop in the bucket compared with the carbon market, which was estimated to be worth $122 billion at the end of 2009, according to research firm New Energy Finance. Yet, just as the early adopters of energy conservation and carbon footprinting are poised to benefit when a federal cap and trade is implemented, so will the early adopters of conservation.

    One question for utilities will be whether it will take a crisis, such as drought or contamination, to drive change, which is likely to be the case, some observers say.

    "Utilities are conservative, but they have to be conservative," Lux Research’s Landis says. "But the problem [of aging infrastructure] can’t be ignored. We’ll see [water IT] take off when it becomes more pressing."

    While IBM and Itron are primarily focusing on utility and municipal customers, there are also opportunities to be had in the private sector, helping corporations measure and reduce their water use. And since industry is in general more automated, with more sophisticated IT already in place, water IT is a natural fit, XPV Capital’s Henderson says.

    "The real opportunity for advanced water companies with an IT-intensive product is with enterprise," Shenkar says. Water utilities, which are less able to make rapid changes, are not characteristic of an innovative market, whereas enterprise can make decisions more quickly and scale up, she adds.

    One place where Shenkar predicts fierce competition is among enterprise software systems. Enterprise software companies, such asSAP (NYSE: SAP), are turning their focus to carbon management, but there’s likely to be a need to collect and integrate water data into the bigger environmental management picture.

    As for what will drive the private sector’s adoption of water IT, corporations are beginning to take notice of water risks, and how water shortages could impact their manufacturing processes or supply chains. Some obvious examples include food and beverage companies, such as Coca-Cola Co. (NYSE: KO), or semiconductor manufacturers, but water concerns are likely to seep into every corner of the marketplace.

    "Corporations are paying attention," Henderson says.. "Think about everything we make and where it’s made, and you can see why people get worried."

    Investors are starting to think about water, as well. In December 2009, Goldman Sachs, GE (NYSE:GE) and the World Resources Institute launched an initiative to develop a Water Index to measure companies’ water-related risks and inform investment decisions. The initiative is starting with a pilot project to assess the water-related risks of a power plant in China, but is expected to eventually include other industries and regions.

    In the meantime, now is a good time to be a company in development, positioned to ride the rising tide of demand for water management, Shenkar says.

    "It’s an excellent time to be an entrepreneur in the water industry. It’s an industry in transition," Henderson says. "The change is happening, and it’s becoming a pull rather than a push."

  • 08-Feb-10 22:40 | Site Administrator (administrator)

    The development of our March 9 Water Forum at Pearl Stable is going extremely well:

    As you can see on our web site (www.sacleantech.org) our program will be kicked off by Mayor Julian Castro and Texas Speaker of the House Joe Straus.  Robert Rivard will moderate an outstanding panel consisting of Robert Gulley, Weir LaBatt, and Robert Puente.

    Present at our Forum and then holding hearings later that day in San Antonio will be all members of the Texas House Natural Resources committee.

    Water leadership individuals, including Steve Clouse - COO, SAWS; Velma Danielson - General Manager, Edwards Aquifer Authority; and Suzanne Scott, General Manager San Antonio River Authority are working to present some great exhibits at the Pearl Stable prior to and after the Forum.

    And today, Bill Moll, President of KLRN, told Bob Rivard and me that KLRN plans to record our forum for TV broadcast in prime time a week or two following our event. And they will make the recording available to PBS stations across Texas.   

    And finally, it is clear that this Forum will be a complete sell-out within the next week or so. We only have a few tables and seats yet to be sold. So if you would like to participate as an organization or as an individual, please do not procrastinate.

    Thanks, Mike

    burke_michael@sbcglobal.net
    210-269-7962

    PS  We would appreciate more volunteers to ensure our event is an outstanding success.  Please let me know if you can help.  Thanks.

  • 07-Feb-10 18:52 | Site Administrator (administrator)

    I realize that the first offering below has little to do with Clean Technology or Sustainability. But each of you will benefit significantly from reading Bob Rivard’s column and watching the Texas Lyceum forum on Cyber Security broadcast by KLRN on Thursday, February 18 at 8:00pm.

    As good as Bob Rivard’s column below is, his performance as Moderator of the Cyber Security forum is superb – don’t miss it.

    Mike


    When it comes to cyber security, trust no one

    Robert Rivard – SA Express Feb 6, 2010

    Effective immediately, I've got cyber security religion. It's scary out there, and I'm going on the defensive. You should, too.

    Everybody else is kicking back on a Friday night, sipping a margarita, hanging with friends, planning Super Bowl Sunday. Me?

    I'm changing passwords, downloading patches for outdated programs, running redundant anti-virus programs, sniffing for malware.

    All week I've been enjoying my new MacBook Pro, but after today, the party's over. I trust no one.

    For starters, I've gone into my Word program and changed the name of one of my cleverly named documents, "mypasswords.doc." Guess what I kept in there?

    Hackers around the world apparently are laughing at me, my identity theft just a few keystrokes away for some shadowy mafia figure in Romania, or maybe he's not an Eastern European gangster, but just a mischievous IT nerd in one of the local high school computer labs.

    Apparently there is no way of telling.

    In fact, today's cyber adversary could be tomorrow's protector: pimpled troublemaker today, entrepreneur millionaire before he's 30 years old, with his own company that helps defend clueless companies run by people like you and me against hackers.

    I thought my 500 closest friends on Facebook could be trusted with my periodic updates and photos. How naïve. My friends happen to be cool. But I never stopped to consider the sheer malice of the friends of friends of my friends, whoever they are.

    Parents, it's no longer a matter of taking precautions to make sure your children are not exposed to the wrong influences on the Web — like porn sites, for example. Go ask the cyber-savvy kids to help you tighten your own shoddy security. If you're lucky, they'll help before your tax returns spill onto the Internet.

    We are such easy prey.

    That's what I learned Friday evening at the Charline McCombs Empire Theater, where I moderated a panel of cyber security experts for a full house of visiting members of the Texas Lyceum, which is holding its statewide meeting in San Antonio this weekend.

    The hourlong discussion will be aired on KLRN-TV at 8 p.m. Feb. 18. Public television stations around the state also will air the program as cyber security — the next big thing — becomes front and center for the American public.

    It's an issue that looms as large for the U.S. government, military and law enforcement community as the average Joe who is worried about someone hacking into his American Express account.

    The Chinese government just hacked into Google in pursuit of dissidents (whoops, did I forget to write "allegedly"?), and company officials are turning to the National Security Agency for help in tracing the attack and preventing future cyber assaults

    Truth is, it takes a sense of humor to take in stride the terrible risks that confront us as we enter an era of total digital dependence. The average individual simply cannot calculate the risk or respond to threats that are so invisible I wasn't sure I trusted the panelists I was interviewing.

    They convinced me they were right. I'm cleaning house. I'm not saying you are part of the problem, but if I "unfriend" you on Facebook or "unfollow" you on Twitter, you'll understand. It's nothing personal.

    Robert Rivard is editor of the Express-News. E-mail him at rrivard@express-news.net. Or follow him on Twitter at @editorrivard.


    Public gets a shot at CPS rate proposal

    By Anton Caputo SA Express-News Feb 6, 2010

    CPS Energy has a potentially difficult week ahead of it as it prepares to tackle rate hikes and the future of its controversial nuclear project.

    The utility has proposed a 7.5 percent rate increase for electricity and 8.5 percent for gas. The hikes, which would raise consumers' total power bills a little more than 4 percent, would bring in $99 million for the remainder of fiscal 2010 and $110 million next year. The money would help pay for the new Spruce 2 coal plant, two natural gas units and other programs.

    Residents will have a chance to weigh in at a public forum Monday evening. The utility's board is expected to vote on the rate increases Wednesday, and the City Council will vote Feb. 18. The increases would take effect March 1.

    Acting General Manager Jelynne LeBlanc-Burley said CPS has taken steps to limit spending, including hiring and salary freezes and an 8 percent reduction in its vehicle fleet. It has also slowed tree-trimming and street-lighting projects as well as the installation of an advanced metering system and projects to add environmental equipment to existing plants.

    Still, she said the utility needs the rate increase to keep it fiscally sound and pay for necessary programs and projects.

    "It is the amount needed so that this utility can provide reliable and competitively priced energy," LeBlanc-Burley said. "We have presented a budget that is very clearly focused on meeting our capital needs and our operational costs."

    CPS is likely to hear from residents displeased with the proposal.

    These include attorney Karen Seal, who like many had her trust shaken by the recent nuclear cost-estimate debacle. That began in October with the revelation that an estimate $4 billion higher than the one presented to the public was withheld from the utility's board by CPS executives. Two high-level executives have resigned over the issue, as did the board chair.

    Ratepayers "should be very skeptical of these people because these are the people that just got through misrepresenting things to them," said Seal, who spearheaded a citizens group's failed effort to intervene in a lawsuit spawned by the nuclear project.

    Mayor Julián Castro said he understands the criticism and said it is important for LeBlanc-Burley to begin rebuilding trust by explaining how the organization has changed. But Castro, who also sits on the utility's board, agrees the rate increase is necessary.

    "San Antonio is a growing city with growing energy needs," he said. "There is not a good time for a rate increase, but they are trying to make the most practical decision possible."

    The board is also expected to determine the next move on the nuclear project Wednesday. That could include more funding, LeBlanc-Burley said, even if CPS looks to get out by selling its share.

    Castro, who will be out of town Monday, said he expects the latest cost estimates for the project to be discussed Wednesday.

  • 06-Feb-10 09:03 | Site Administrator (administrator)
     

    1. A boom in distributed solar pv projects
    2. Electric energy storage conference – Feb 18
    3. The cash for clunkers fiasco
    4. A pre-Renewable Energy World Conference event in Austin Feb 22


    Contributed by Lanny Sinkin:

    February 4, 2010, 8:37 am

    A Boom in ‘Distributed’ Solar Projects

    By TODD WOODY

    As big solar power plants planned for the desert Southwest remain bogged down in environmental disputes, utilities increasingly are turning to so-called distributed solar rooftop arrays and small photovoltaic farms that can be built close to transmission lines.

    Over the past few weeks, some 1,300 megawatts’ worth of distributed solar deals and initiatives have been announced or approved. At peak output, that is the equivalent of a big nuclear power plant.

    Two weeks ago in California, regulators authorized the utility Southern California Edison’s program to install 500 megawatts of solar on commercial rooftops. A few days later, they recommended that Pacific Gas and Electric, the dominant utility in Northern California, be given the green light for its own 500-megawatt initiative that aims to install ground-mounted photovoltaic arrays near electrical substations and urban areas.

    The Sacramento Municipal Utility District said in January that it took only a week to sell out its 100-megawatt solar program, which offers developers the opportunity to build photovoltaic projects of up to five megawatts.

    And last week, the New York Power Authority announced a program to install 100 megawatts of solar arrays around the state.

    "All of this is a great indication that solar prices are continuing to get a lot cheaper and that results in scale," said Adam Browning, executive director of Vote Solar, a San Francisco nonprofit that promotes renewable energy.

    An oversupply of solar modules and the rise of Chinese companies tapping low-cost manufacturing have pushed prices down, making photovoltaics a more realistic option for utilities to achieve renewable energy mandates, according to analysts.

    That was evident in a recent spate of deals. This week, Recurrent Energy of San Francisco revealed that it had signed contracts with Southern California Edison to supply 50-megawatts of electricity from small-scale solar farms it will build in Kern and San Bernardino counties on private land.

    The company has also placed bids for the Sacramento utility’s solar project.

    "Distributed solar is faster on permitting, on environmental issues and interconnection to the grid," said Arno Harris, Recurrent’s chief executive. "It offers a safety valve for utilities who don’t want to put all their eggs in one basket."

    Pacific Gas and Electric is following that strategy. On Monday, the utility filed a request that regulators approve a 48-megawatt contract with Eurus Energy America.

    Eurus, which is a joint venture of Japan’s Tokyo Electric Power and Toyota Tsusho, plans to build three photovoltaic farms near Fresno, Calif., according to a filing. The vice president of Sharp Solar, Ron Kenedi, said demand for distributed solar had continued to rise during the recession.

    "It amazes me how much demand has grown throughout the world," Mr. Kenedi said, noting that Sharp’s Memphis solar module factory had added another shift and 180 jobs over the past eight months.

    Related articles at: http://greeninc.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/02/04/a-boon-in-smaller-distributed-solar-projects/


    Submitted by Stephanie Chandler:

    Electric energy storage conference

    Join us for an exciting panel discussion featuring distinguished subject matter experts in the science, technology, and business of electrical energy storage and batteries. Please also take this opportunity to refer your business colleagues to the Austin Clean Energy Group on Meetup.com where they can register to attend this event.

    Panel members:
    Mr. Jeff Bruce, Director of Product Management, Valence Technology, Inc.
    Dr. Jeremy Meyers, Assistant Professor, Center for Electrochemistry, University of Texas at Austin
    Dr. Sam Stimson, Senior Fellow, Boston-Power, Inc.
    Mr. Jay Taylor, Senior Engineer Global Strategist, Dell, Inc.

    February 18, 2010
    Austin City Hall Council Chambers
    5:00 - 8:00 PM
    RSVP required
    Free Parking- see details below.


    Moderated by:
    Gaurav Goel, Registered Patent Agent
    John Cooper, Ecomergence



    Free Parking. The entrance to the parking garage is on Lavaca Street on the east side of City Hall, just past the loading dock. Upon entering the garage, look for the signs that say "Public" which will guide you to the public parking area. Take a ticket at the booth and find parking anywhere on P1, P2 or P3. Be sure to take your ticket with you to get it validated inside.

    The brilliance of the Cash for Clunkers program

    A 15 mpg clunker that travels 12,000 miles a year uses 800 gallons of gas a year.

    A 25 mpg vehicle that travels 12,000 miles a year uses 480 gallons a year.

    So, the average Cash for Clunkers transaction will reduce US gasoline consumption by 320 gallons per year.

    They claim 700,000 clunkers were turned-in, so that's 224 million gallons saved per year.

    That equates to a bit over 5 million barrels of oil.

    5 million barrels is about 5 hours worth of US consumption.

    More importantly, 5 million barrels of oil at $70 per barrel costs about $350 million dollars

    So, the government paid $3 billion of our tax dollars to save $350 million.

    We spent $8.57 for every dollar we saved.

    Way to go Federal government!!


    A pre-Renewable Energy World Conference/Expo event

    How Industry Restructuring Led Texas to
    U.S. Renewable Energy Leadership

    Monday, February 22, 2010 8 a.m. - 5 p.m.

    Rm. 13B Austin Convention Center
    Austin, Texas

     

    Registration Fee: $675.00, includes workshop materials, certificate of completion, coffee breaks and lunch

    Instructors
    Bob Webb, General Counsel, Biofuels Power Corp.; Henry Durrwachter, Director of ERCOT Market Services, Luminant Energy; Steve Wiese, Principal, Clean Energy Associates; Mark Kapner, P.E., Senior Strategy Engineer, Austin Energy; Stephen Krebs, Partner, Baker Botts LLP; Nick Lampson, Principal, Clean Energy Advisory Group; Pike Powers, Chairman, Texas Technology Initiative; Karl Rabago, Vice President of Distributed Energy Services, Austin Energy

    Who Should Attend
    Anyone involved in or considering involvement in developing, buying or financing renewable energy generation within the competitive wholesale and retail markets of the Electric Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT), the intrastate grid serving 85% of the electric load in Texas.

    Overview
    Top Texas experts and key players will provide an understanding of the special circumstances of developing renewable electric generation in the intrastate ERCOT grid in Texas, emphasizing the political climate, philosophy of government, regulatory approach and competitive retail and wholesale electric markets, as factors creating the spectacular growth of renewable generation since the Legislature launched unbundled competitive electric markets in 1999. 

    Texas has a business and political climate friendly to the development of independent generation with minimal permit requirements for new generation and a robust transmission system that is significantly expanding its transmission grid without cost to generators to accommodate the rapid expansion of wind energy in West Texas, as well as solar and biomass generation throughout ERCOT. The State’s robust economic growth continues to create a need to add new generating capacity in a competitive wholesale electric market primarily composed of non-utility independent generating entities.  Unique markets and regulatory systems create a need for a different approach to renewable energy development, financing and commercial operation.

     

    Course Highlights

    o What Makes the Restructured Texas Electric Industry in ERCOT the Nation’s Leader in Renewable Energy? - Bob Webb, General Counsel, Biofuels Power Corporation

    o Delivering the Goods— CREZ Transmission and Integrating Intermittent Electric Generation - Henry Durrwachter, Director of ERCOT Market Services, Luminant Energy

    o Solar Energy: The Second Stage of the West Texas Renewable Energy Boom - Steve Wiese, Principal, Clean Energy Associatees

    o Utility Scale Solar Generation Technologies Being Developed in Texas - Mark Kapner, PE, Senior Strategy Engineer, Austin Energy

    o Project Financing with the ERCOT Difference and a Difficult Economy - Stephen Krebs, partner, Baker Botts, LLP

    o How Can We Get Our Full Share of the Federal Stimulus for Renewables? - Nick Lampson, principal, Clean Energy Advisory Group

    o How the State of Texas and Local Communities Coordinate Support of Sustainable Energy - Pike Powers, Chairman, Texas Technology Initiative

    o Texas Municipal Utilities are Leading the Drive for Sustainable Renewable Energy - Karl Rabago, Vice President of Distributed Energy Services, Austin Energy

    For further conference information and registration, visit

     Renewable Energy World 2010 Conference 

     For more information:
    Contact: Russel Smith
    Phone: (512) 345-5446
    Email:
    rsmith@treia.org

<< first  < prev   1   2   3   4   5   ...   next >  last >> 
 
    Connect with us on Facebook  Connect with us on LinkedIn  Connect with us on Twitter

© 2008-2010 San Antonio Clean Technology Forum